c***@yahoo.co.uk
2006-06-12 10:58:06 UTC
Please could anybody help as I seem to have a hit a brick wall. I have
read through the information on the Microsoft site about Clustering and
Load Balancing but it just doesn't seem to cater for what I am trying
to do, unless I have missed something. My eyeballs are dry from so
much reading!
I have for example, three web servers that are load balanced, these
receive a message from the client, they then create a com object and
pass that down to one of two database servers on a Cluster.
-----------------
[101] [102] [103] (Windows Load Balancing Service)
-----------------
|
|
------------
[DB1] [DB2] (MicroSoft Cluster Service)
------------
If 101 gets the message, but goes down, then there will be no com
object sent to the DB. So is there a way of copying the message
received on 101 to 102 and 103, but making sure only one com object
either created on 101, or say 102 if 101 server goes down, is sent ot
the DB?
Thank you
read through the information on the Microsoft site about Clustering and
Load Balancing but it just doesn't seem to cater for what I am trying
to do, unless I have missed something. My eyeballs are dry from so
much reading!
I have for example, three web servers that are load balanced, these
receive a message from the client, they then create a com object and
pass that down to one of two database servers on a Cluster.
-----------------
[101] [102] [103] (Windows Load Balancing Service)
-----------------
|
|
------------
[DB1] [DB2] (MicroSoft Cluster Service)
------------
If 101 gets the message, but goes down, then there will be no com
object sent to the DB. So is there a way of copying the message
received on 101 to 102 and 103, but making sure only one com object
either created on 101, or say 102 if 101 server goes down, is sent ot
the DB?
Thank you